Abstract
Objective: To reflect about current pain management in cancer patients treated under the Brazilian Private Healthcare System, considering legal boundaries, access to essential drugs and involved ethical issues. Panelists aimed to reach a consensus about recommendations to increase access to proper analgesia for patients with cancer secondary pain. Methods: Four Brazilian specialists, being a radiation oncologist (and bioethicist), an oncologist, a pain specialist and a CEO of a private healthcare plan, met after the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, held in Chicago, and discussed the aforementioned subjects. A consensus was reached and is described below. Results: Cancer pain is prevailing in our country, probably undertreated, and may be a prevalent cause of medical services overuse, which may increase healthcare costs. Thus, there may be an opportunity to improve patient’s quality of life, with a positive budget impact for private healthcare plans, if this treatment becomes mandatorily reimbursed. There are several studies in the literature showing similar results, but this should be prospectively studied, preferable using real word evidence, at the Brazilian scenario. Cancer pain treatment protocols, designed by specialists, should be designed in agreement with all stakeholders. Conclusion: Panelists agreed that pain treatment, which must be considered a human right, is a clear priority in Brazil. All stakeholders should collaborate in designing protocols to improve patient’s quality of life, consequently improving health insurance’s budgets. If so, this would have clear consequences in access to innovative cancer treatments, as those discussed during the 2019 ASCO meeting.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.