Abstract
From the perspective of the legal system, the first decade of democracy has been characterised by the dominant discourse of access to justice. Section 35 of the Constitution guarantees the right of an accused person to legal representation at state expense, where a “substantial injustice” might otherwise result. Thus, access to justice has routinely come to be defined as access to legal representation in criminal trials. This interpretation of the notion of access to justice is problematic because it fails to address a range of issues affecting the poor in our society, notably the realisation of their socio-economic rights. This article argues that the concept of access to justice needs to be redefined to incorporate the promotion of equality and social justice for the poor and other vulnerable groups in our society.Such redefinition will, of necessity, entail important shifts in the conceptualisation oflegal aid provision, as well as concomitant budgetary and other consequences.The article examines various strategies to address the legal isolation of the poor,and concludes with some recommendations as to how the reconceptualised projectfor access may be achieved.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
