Abstract
McGill UniversityThe & watched series of one, two, three, four, or six letters presented visually,one every 300 msec., and then decided if a probe letter, presented 600 msec,later, was or was not in the original list. Decision time increased with thenumber of letters in a series; the increase was more pronounced for YES thanfor NO decisions. Within the four- and six-letter sequences, there were pro-nounced primacy and recency effects. These results favor a theory that 5 hasdirect access to an internal representation of the probe letter and decidesYES or NO depending on its memory strength. They are inconsistent withtheories which hold that 5 scans through the series to discover whether theprobe is there.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
