Abstract
Access to Asylum deals with the reach of international human rights and refugee law in a globalized world, facing the issue of extraterritorial, and sometimes also delegated, migration controls that states implement through carrier sanctions, immigration liaison officers, maritime interdiction, and cooperation with third countries, among other measures. The author asks a series of questions, which he addresses through a mixed methodology, combining legal analysis with a political science approach. The key point is to elucidate whether the de facto de-localization of controls has translated into an equal de jure extension of the scope of application of international protection obligations. The reasoning proceeds in consecutive steps. It first enquires into the extraterritorial applicability of international human rights and refugee law norms, to then examine the issue of attribution of conduct and the possibility of legal responsibility being engaged in circumstances in which states delegate authority to private actors. Finally, the extent of positive obligations in scenarios of ‘offshore’ and ‘outsourced’ controls is also explored.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.