Abstract

AbstractThis article presents the results of the analysis of archaeological ceramics collected during landscape surveys in the Vidarbha of Maharashtra, India; and offers the first attempt at a regional pottery typology for this area. Here, as in many other parts of South Asia, the pottery from archaeological sites have been subject to considerable scrutiny. Yet, so far approaches to their study have focussed on mainly their surface colour and feel. This has resulted in overly simplistic typologies that do not (and cannot) accommodate the full range of variation that exists within a ceramic assemblage, and so limit their value as archaeological evidence. Addressing this, we apply a chaîne opératoire-based approach to the analysis of a ceramic assemblage that we have been developing in this region. This results in a much more complex and detailed pottery typology than has so far been achieved. Throughout this study we also identify points of comparison with familiar parallels published elsewhere. In doing so, the resulting typology, while by no means the final word on the matter, provides a valuable and flexible resource that others working in this region and neighbouring areas can use for their own analyses and research. Moreover, in shifting the bases of categorisation and classification to the ways that pottery was made, we are able to incorporate far more of the variation that exists in the material itself. Indeed, the amount of variation can be somewhat bewildering in comparison to the standard (limiting) typological categories that populate earlier reports, and forces us to question those frameworks. Yet, we argue that it is precisely this sort of uncertainty that has to be embraced if the study of archaeological ceramics for the region of the ancient Vidarbha is going to continue to develop as a meaningful area of archaeological enquiry.

Highlights

  • This article presents the first attempt at formulating a regional pottery typology for the mid-first millennium BCE to the second millennium CE in South Asia

  • What these studies share in common is an appreciation of the need to examine ceramics in South Asia in new ways, and in doing so be more sensitive to all of the variation that is so obviously apparent within any assemblage. This is rarely a comfortable prospect, for as soon as we admit the possibility that there may be lots of variation in the ceramic record that has not been recorded, we are forced to admit that we have not known how best to record it. This paper explores these issues and offers a solution to this problem by testing the applicability of a chaîne opératoire-based approach to the study of archaeological ceramics that we have developed in one particular region of South Asia: Vidarbha, in Central India

  • As far as the catalogue of vessel shapes is concerned, we have decided to employ a continuous numbering system that follows the succession of classes. The reasons for this and, for that matter, the continuous naming system that we have employed for our classes and fabric groups, have to do with the fact that our assemblage comprises material collected from widely different areas and the foundational nature of pottery studies in this region. Such are the typological lacunae and differences in ceramic material from different areas, we decided that it made sense to account for and preserve as much variation in our typology as possible

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article presents the first attempt at formulating a regional pottery typology for the mid-first millennium BCE to the second millennium CE (the early historic and medieval periods) in South Asia. In doing so, it is necessarily concerned with the study of archaeological ceramics in this area. Certain pottery groups that are known to date to particular centuries or periods are used as relative measures for dating the archaeological contexts in which they are found, construct chronological sequences and determine phases of activity that took place at that site. Pots have been the means by which archaeologists have identified and defined cultural groupings across the subcontinent in pre- and proto-historic

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call