Abstract
This essay is an attempt to illustrate an alternative conceptualization of what is considered “science.” The systemic epistemology introduced by Bateson and others is described as an equally viable complement to traditional epistemological orientations. The distinction between the two orientations is the recognition, within the systemic epistemology, of the interventive role of the observer. A specific model is introduced as providing a working method for conducting research within the systemic epistemology. This model is borrowed from the field of systemic family therapy where intervention in social systems is celebrated and accepted. This model, although clinical in orientation, offers useful guidelines for developing research programs which acknowledge social intervention.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.