Abstract

BackgroundCancer can be a distressing experience for cancer patients and carers, impacting on psychological, social, physical and spiritual functioning. However, health professionals often fail to detect distress in their patients due to time constraints and a lack of experience. Also, with the focus on the patient, carer needs are often overlooked. This study investigated the acceptability of brief distress screening with the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List (PL) to operators of a community-based telephone helpline, as well as to cancer patients and carers calling the service.MethodsOperators (n = 18) monitored usage of the DT and PL with callers (cancer patients/carers, >18 years, and English-speaking) from September-December 2006 (n = 666). The DT is a single item, 11-point scale to rate level of distress. The associated PL identifies the cause of distress.ResultsThe DT and PL were used on 90% of eligible callers, most providing valid responses. Benefits included having an objective, structured and consistent means for distress screening and triage to supportive care services. Reported challenges included apparent inappropriateness of the tools due to the nature of the call or level of caller distress, the DT numeric scale, and the level of operator training.ConclusionsWe observed positive outcomes to using the DT and PL, although operators reported some challenges. Overcoming these challenges may improve distress screening particularly by less experienced clinicians, and further development of the PL items and DT scale may assist with administration. The DT and PL allow clinicians to direct/prioritise interventions or referrals, although ongoing training and support is critical in distress screening.

Highlights

  • Cancer can be a distressing experience for cancer patients and carers, impacting on psychological, social, physical and spiritual functioning [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

  • The Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List (PL) has been well-validated in numerous settings with various cancer groups [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] very little has been written on the acceptability of the measure

  • The current study investigates the acceptability of the tool to helpline operators and callers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cancer can be a distressing experience for cancer patients and carers, impacting on psychological, social, physical and spiritual functioning. Health professionals often fail to detect distress in their patients due to time constraints and a lack of experience. This study investigated the acceptability of brief distress screening with the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List (PL) to operators of a community-based telephone helpline, as well as to cancer patients and carers calling the service. Health professionals often fail to detect distress in their patients [12] due to time constraints, and a lack of confidence in assessing distress and using psychometric instruments [13]. With the focus on the patient, carer needs are often overlooked and only 50% of those with serious psychological distress will seek support [3,6]. The DT and PL has been well-validated in numerous settings with various cancer groups [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] very little has been written on the acceptability of the measure

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.