Abstract

Antenatal progesterone prevents preterm birth (PTB) in women with a short cervix or prior PTB in daily vaginal or weekly injectable formulations, respectively. Neither has been tested for the indication of maternal HIV, which is associated with an elevated risk of PTB. The Vaginal Progesterone (VP) Trial was a pilot feasibility study of VP to prevent HIV-related PTB in Lusaka, Zambia. Using mixed methods, we concurrently evaluated the acceptability of the trial and the study product among participants. Over a 1-year period, we enrolled 140 pregnant women living with HIV into a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of daily self-administered VP or placebo. We administered an endline questionnaire to all participants and conducted in-depth interviews with 30 participants to assess barriers and facilitators to uptake and retention in the trial and to study product adherence. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, translated into English as needed, and independently coded by two analysts to capture emerging themes. Of 131 participants who completed the questionnaire, 128 (98%) reported that nothing was difficult when asked the hardest part about using the study product. When given a hypothetical choice between vaginal and injectable progesterone, 97 (74%) chose vaginal, 31 (24%) injectable, and 3 (2%) stated no preference. Most interviewees reported no difficulties with using the study product; others cited minor side effects and surmountable challenges. Strategies that supported adherence included setting alarms, aligning dosing with antiretrovirals, receiving encouragement from friends and family, sensing a benefit to their unborn baby, and positive feedback from study staff. Participants who reported preference of a vaginal medication over injectable described familiarity with the vaginal product, a fear of needles and resulting pain, and inconvenience of a weekly clinic visit. Those who would prefer weekly injections cited fewer doses to remember. Perceived barriers to study participation included mistrust about the motivations behind research, suspicion of Satanism, and futility or possible harm from a placebo. We report key influences on acceptability of a randomized trial of VP to prevent PTB among HIV-infected women in Zambia, which should inform methods to promote uptake, adherence, and retention in a full-scale trial.

Highlights

  • Maternal HIV increases the risk of preterm birth (PTB) [1]

  • Previous studies of vaginal microbicides to prevent HIV infection among non-pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa have suffered from low adherence and substantial discrepancies between self-reported and objective measures of adherence to self-administered vaginal products [4,5,6]

  • The Vaginal Progesterone (VP) Trial was conducted at the Kamwala District Health Center in Lusaka, Zambia between July 2017 and June 2018. 140 pregnant women were randomized by permuted block design between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation to receive once-daily self-administered vaginal suppository of either progesterone or placebo in a 1:1 ratio

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maternal HIV increases the risk of preterm birth (PTB) [1]. While PTB is a global epidemic, the burden is concentrated in low-resource settings where preventive therapies and life-saving neonatal intensive care are often limited [2]. In the setting of pregnancy, women may be more motivated to adhere to self-administered vaginal products to facilitate better outcomes for their babies, as has been shown in some studies of adherence to antiretroviral medications for prevention of perinatal HIV transmission [8]. This motivation may be a result of both an intrinsic desire to have a healthy baby as well as social desirability resulting from high value placed on successful childbearing, regardless of HIV serostatus [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call