Accelerometer-Based Navigation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Improved Alignment but No Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundComputer and accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) tools have demonstrated improved mechanical alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). ABN, in particular, is attractive due to avoidance of pins and trackers. Prior literature has yet to demonstrate an associated improvement in functional outcomes using ABN compared to conventional instrumentation (CONV). The purpose of this study was to compare alignment and functional outcomes between CONV and ABN in primary TKA in a large patient series. MethodsA retrospective study of 1,925 TKAs performed by a single surgeon sequentially was performed. There were 1,223 TKAs performed with CONV and measured resection technique. There were 702 TKAs performed with distal femoral ABN and restricted kinematic alignment goals. We compared radiographic alignment, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores, rates of manipulation under anesthesia, and needs for aseptic revisions between cohorts. Chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, and t-tests were used to compare demographics and outcomes. ResultsThe ABN cohort had higher rates of neutral alignment postoperatively than the CONV cohort (ABN 74% versus CONV 56%, P < .001). Rates of manipulation under anesthesia (ABN 2.8% versus CONV 3.4%, P = .382) and aseptic revision (ABN 0.9% versus CONV 1.6%, P = .189) were similar. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (ABN 42.6 versus CONV 42.9, P = .4554), physical health (ABN 63.4 versus CONV 63.3, P = .944), mental health (ABN 51.4 versus CONV 52.7, P = .4349), and pain (ABN 32.7 versus CONV 30.9, P = .256) scores were similar. ConclusionABN is valuable in its ability to improve postoperative alignment but does not improve complication rates or patient-reported functional outcomes.