Abstract
The critical theory of acceleration provides a general framework for addressing the governance of technoscience in democratic societies in terms of “politics of time”, and to compare the different theoretical approaches aimed at steering their nonlinear dynamic towards socially and ethically desirable outcomes. To this aim, I will first introduce to the semantic ambiguity of the notion of governance, born as neoliberal response to the acceleration and increased complexity of globalized society (governance 1.0) and lately largely reframed as democratic and participatory governance (governance 2.0). I will then present a case of governance of technoscientific innovation in conditions of extreme urgency, the accelerated development of pandemic vaccines, as an example of the ambiguity between the two meanings. Then I will focus on the problem of the urgency of decision under the current paradigm of 2.0 governance of technoscientific innovation, which, even in non-emergency conditions, is affected by the temporal paradox highlighted by the Collingridge dilemma, in order to examine the different coping strategies proposed in the recent literature, spanning from anticipatory to adaptive approaches.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
