Abstract

For almost a decade, regulators and pharmaceutical industry groups have been interested in electronic source (eSource) in clinical trials (Nordo et al. in Learn Health Syst 3:e10076, 2019). eSource may provide efficiencies and value; however, eSource adoption is fragmented and slow. Acceleration of eSource adoption is a critical step in modernizing the conduct of clinical trials. The desired future state is one in which all source data, acquired through any context (e.g., healthcare delivery, chronic disease management) and actor (e.g., healthcare professional, patient, caregiver), are completely electronic, adequate in quality, and fully acceptable in clinical trial submissions by regulators worldwide. Achieving this desired future state requires transformative change management to foster adoption and minimize the burden of implementing eSource. Realizing this vision requires collaborative and dedicated efforts from multiple stakeholders, including patients, clinical trial participants, sites, technology vendors, standards organizations, regulators, payers, and sponsors. Stakeholders should align upon guidance to promote data integrity, data privacy, data security, and interoperability. The eSource revolution requires open dialogue, inclusive of shared learnings among stakeholders, to collectively and rapidly advance adoption. Adoption of eSource will optimize clinical research by enabling faster access to research data and more rapid decision-making, increasing clinical trial efficiency. Furthermore, adoption of eSource will improve data integrity by allowing direct data flow from the source to the sponsor’s system, with minimal or no human intervention. This paper provides the TransCelerate point of view (POV) and recommendations to achieve the future state vision of complete utilization of eSource data in clinical trials and builds on previous TransCelerate eSource publications.

Highlights

  • Since 2010, the [1] European Medicines Agency (EMA), United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) have all either expressed interest in or provided written guidance on their expectations regarding clinical source data in electronic form [2,3,4,5,6]

  • While the TransCelerate Sponsor Landscape paper [14] defines the distinct types of eSource, this point of view (POV) paper describes the changes necessary to accelerate all types of eSource implementations and move towards a future state in which the global use and acceptance of eSource is fully achieved

  • Cultivate an environment where eSource access and ease of use are propitious for clinical trial participants, sites, and sponsors

Read more

Summary

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Accelerating the Adoption of eSource in Clinical Research: A Transcelerate Point of View.

Introduction
Future State
The appropriate people involved in protocol and Clinical
Site and Clinical Trial Participant Burden
Technological Challenges
Management of Unstructured Data
Limited Interoperability Between Healthcare and Clinical Research Systems
Inconsistency in the Use of eSource Standards
Limited Scalability of Data Integrations
Lack of Informatics and eSource Acumen
Lack of Adaptability in Validation for EHR Systems
Lack of Clarity in Privacy and Security Laws
Lack of Coordinated Industry Efforts
Device Mode Equivalency Testing
Clinical Trial Participant Burden
Lack of Classifications and Qualifications
Conclusion and Next Steps
Open Access
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.