Abstract
SummaryFinite‐difference methods based on high‐order stencils are commonly used for modeling of seismic wave propagation, weather forecasting, computational fluid dynamics, convolutional neural networks, and others. Nowadays, the community commonly employs graphics processing units (GPUs) to accelerate such stencil computations. As a result, knowing how to write efficient stencil computations for GPUs is of significant interest. While high‐performance, low‐order stencils on GPUs have been studied extensively in the literature, not all proposed approaches work well for high‐order stencils. Furthermore, coping with boundary conditions used with stencils for seismic modeling makes it challenging to efficiently exploit thread‐level parallelism on GPUs. In this article, we describe several implementations of a 25‐point stencil. We evaluate our stencil code shapes, memory hierarchy usage, data access patterns, and other performance attributes on several modern GPUs and compare them with machine rooflines. On average, our top‐performing kernels achieve six times the performance of a 25‐point stencil code developed in C and mapped to GPUs using OpenACC. Several of our implementations have excellent performance portability across multiple generations of both NVIDIA and AMD GPUs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.