Abstract

In this paper, by using a series of uniaxial tests, accelerating effects of cyclic creep due to the alternative load are compared with constant load creep behavior of CD 304L. Austenitic stainless steel 304L is used mostly in power generation and petrochemical industries due to its high temperature creep-fatigue resistance. Test samples have been obtained from cold drawn bars and the material conforms to ASTM A276-05A specifications. Uniaxial tests have been carried out at temperatures of 687, 717, and 737°C under constant and alternating loads. The effects of alternating load and the hold time on the mechanical behavior of the material and fatigue or creep damage values have been studied. The results show the strong interaction between these two damage mechanisms. It has been observed that due to the high temperature level, creep damage is dominant even in tests with very short hold times. Also, it has been shown that by increasing the hold time, the creep strain rate increases and consequently, the creep lifetime reduces. Most importantly, the results highlight the major effect of the alternating loads in increasing creep strain rate and reducing the creep lifetime compared with the constant load tests with the same average stress. In other words, the creep lifetime under alternating load is much shorter than the creep lifetime at constant load test carried out with the average load value.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call