Abstract

A single-shot T2-weighted deep-learning-based image reconstruction (DL-HASTE) has been recently developed allowing for shorter acquisition time than conventional half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo-spin echo (HASTE). The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of conventional 6mm HASTE with DL-HASTE at 4mm and 6mm slice thickness. 91 patients (51 female; mean±SD age: 44±10years) who underwent 3T MR enterography from 5/15/2023-7/15/2023 including pelvic conventional HASTE and DL-HASTE were included. Patients either had 4mm-DL-HASTE or 6mm-DL-HASTE. Four abdominal radiologists, blinded to sequence type, independently evaluated overall image quality, artifacts over bowel, bowel wall sharpness, and confidence for the presence/absence of bowel abnormalities on 5-point Likert scales. Readers recorded the presence/absence of ileal wall thickening, ileal inflammation, stricture, and penetrating disease on each sequence. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with continuity correction was used for paired comparisons and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for unpaired ordinal comparisons. A p<.05 indicated statistical significance. Acquisition times for 6mm HASTE, 4mm-DL-HASTE, and 6mm-DL-HASTE were 64s, 51s, and 49s, respectively. Overall image quality and bowel sharpness were significantly improved for 4mm-DL-HASTE versus HASTE for 3/4 readers (all p<.05) and similar for the 4th reader (p>.05). Diagnostic confidence was similar for all readers (p>.05). 6mm-DL-HASTE was similar to HASTE for bowel sharpness, image quality, and confidence for 3/4 readers (all p>.05). The presence of ileal thickening, ileal inflammation, stricture, and penetrating disease were similar for all readers for HASTE, 4mm-DL-HASTE, and 6mm-DL-HASTE (all p>.05). 4mm-DL-HASTE had superior image quality than conventional HASTE at shorter acquisition time.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.