Abstract
Honey was subjected to GC-MS analysis in order to identify and quantify acaricides residues (2,4-dimethylaniline, brompropilate, amitraz, coumaphos, fluvalinate). Two rapid methods were compared for the extraction and purification of acaricides from honey. First method uses as extraction solvent acetonitrile in the presence of high quantities of salts, which underwent a clean up step known like dispersive solid-phase extraction dSPE PSA (QuEChERS method). In the second method the acaricides were eluted with dichloromethane from the mixture of the sample with diatomaceous earth. Both methods offered the extraction of all mentioned acaricides, but the second one offered higher recoveries, lower costs and was less time consuming for sample preparation. LOD for all acaricides ranged from 0.8-8.3 I¼g/kg and for LOQ between 1 and 9.7 I¼g/kg. Higher recovery rates (90 - 108%) were obtained when sample preparation involved diatomaceous earth.Â
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Animal Science and Biotechnologies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.