Abstract

Purpose of the paper: The present study seeks to shed light on the relationship between team background diversity and growth performance in academic spinoffs. Academic spin-offs are an important means to exploit and transfer the results of academic and scientific research. However, empirical investigations highlight that they tend to have more homogeneous teams and lower performance than independent new ventures. Methodology: We focus on the disciplinary background of academic and nonacademic members in order to assess the team heterogeneity. The sample is composed of 67 academic spin-offs. Hierarchical regression analysis has been used for our exploratory purpose. Findings: The results show that the functional diversity affects positively firm growth and this impact is significantly higher in the case of corporate venture backed spin-offs. Moreover, our findings suggest that the integration of market-oriented skills and business-related networks and competencies through the presence of CVC strengthen the relationship between heterogeneity and performance. Implications: A growing body of literature shows that functional diversity is more likely to have positive effects than demographical diversity. Our results confirm the key role of a balanced composition between academic and non-academic profiles. Furthermore, this functional heterogeneity can be fruitfully extended by external market capabilities conveyed by the presence of a corporate venture capital. Originality of the paper: This exploratory study is a first attempt to fill the gap on the relationship between diversity and performance. The originality of the analysis lies in deepening the interaction between team functional background and corporate venture in assessing the performance of academic spin-offs.

Highlights

  • Academic Spin-Offs (ASOs) emerge out of a university or a research institute as a means of potential value generation from a scientific research (Clarysse et al, 2005; Visintin and Pittino, 2014)

  • The paper presents an exploratory analysis that aims to contribute to the study of the relationship between heterogeneity and performance, looking at the specific case of ASOs

  • Our results extend prior knowledge about the appropriate composition of ASOs’ team and the integration of marketrelated skills and business-related networks with academic technical and research competencies (Vohora et al, 2004; Visintin and Pittino, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drawing from studies on team functional diversity (Tekleab et al, 2016; Visintin and Pittino, 2014), this study attempts to shed more light on the link between team functional heterogeneity and ASOs’ performance. Bernardo Balboni Academic spin-offs’ (i.e. gender, age, ethnicity, and tenure) or functional educational team heterogeneity: an exploratory analysis on and functional background), and it is the most common type of group growth performance diversity investigated (Williams and O’Reilly, 1998; Chowdhury, 2005; Van. Knippenberg and Schippers, 2007). Decision-making paradigm emphasizes the positive effects of group trait diversity on performance. In line with this latter view, people with different opinions and characteristics may contribute to increase the group resources, since they provide a broader range of task-relevant knowledge, skills and abilities (Williams and O’Reilly, 1998)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.