Abstract

Self-handicapping strategies become a life pattern in many low achieving students in an attempt to link their poor academic performance to sources other than one's ability factors. Frequent use of these strategies leads to decrement in self-efficacy related to academic competence as less and less time is devoted to scholastic activities. With the view that introducing self-regulatory patterns into the daily schedules of the students would decrease the faulty patterns of learning, this study compared two groups of seventh graders. The treatment group was provided with dual component self-regulatory strategies training including motivational and cognitive strategies, while the control group was exposed to only traditional classroom teaching methodology. ANCOVA results indicate a significant increase in the academic self-efficacy among the treatment group students at post-training. No significant shift was found in academic self-handicapping strategies used in the treatment group. However, during the intervention period there was a significant increase in the use of academic self-handicapping strategies by control group students. Content analysis of responses to open-ended probes indicate an increase in perceived academic self-efficacy and a decrement in academic self-handicapping at post-training stage.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.