Abstract

This article describes the data collection and use of data for the computation of rankings within RePEc (Research Papers in Economics). This encompasses the determination of impact factors for journals and working paper series, as well as the ranking of authors, institutions, and geographic regions. The various ranking methods are also compared, using a snapshot of the data.

Highlights

  • RePEc has become an important bibliographic service for economics and related fields

  • This article describes the data collection and use of data for the computation of rankings within RePEc (Research Papers in Economics). This encompasses the determination of impact factors for journals and working paper series, as well as the ranking of authors, institutions, and geographic regions

  • When authors register with the RePEc Author Service, they have the opportunity to specify with which institutions they are affiliated with among those listed in EDIRC, but they can suggest new entities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

RePEc has become an important bibliographic service for economics and related fields. A considerable amount of data has been collected regarding who authored which paper, where it was published, who reads it, and where it is cited. One way to use this wealth of data is to compute rankings of individuals, journals (and series), institutions, and even countries. Country-specific rankings have been used in various professional publications and even the popular press. It is time for the methodology behind these rankings to be explained. No other effort has included working papers, which have become a very important way to disseminate research in economics, if not the most important.

Bibliographic Data
John Keynes
Institutional Data
Citation Data
Abstract Views and Downloads Data
Further Refinements of the Data
Discussion of Coverage
Computation of Impact Factors and Ranking of Series or Journals
Simple Impact Factors
Recursive Impact Factors
Discounted Impact Factors
H-Index
Aggregation
Discussion
Ranking of Works
Rankings of Authors
Criteria based on the Number of Works
AWScWorks
Criteria based on Citation Counts
16. RCAuthors
Criteria based on Journal Page Counts
AWScPages
Criteria based on Popularity on Reporting RePEc Services
ADownloads
Criteria based on Co-Authorship Networks
Aggregation of Criteria
Harmonic Mean of Ranks
Arithmetic Mean of Ranks
Geometric Mean of Ranks
Lexicographic Ordering of Ranks
Graphicolexic Ordering of Ranks
Sum of Percent of Best in Criterion
Exclusion of Extremes
Discussion and Aggregation Choice
Ranking of Institutions
Ranking of Geographic Regions
Ranking within Geographic Regions
Ranking of Female Economists
Ranking of Young Economists
Ranking of Deceased Economists
Ranking of Top-Level Institutions
Ranking within Fields
A Glimpse at Results
Impact Factors
Authors
Institutions
10.1. What RePEc can Do and Others Not
Timeliness
Current Affiliations
Pre-Publications
Certainty about Authorship
New Ranking Criteria
Findings
10.2. What RePEc cannot Do
11. Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.