Abstract

We show that academic directors significantly increase firms’ R&D investment and innovation outputs. Following an academic director’s death and relative to a non-academic director’s death, the average firm reduces R&D by 2.0% of total assets and its market value of innovations declines by 4.4%. The results are not driven by PhD CEOs or non-academic PhD directors. Consistent with an advising channel, academic directors in STEM disciplines are particularly pro-innovation. Firms with academic directors are more likely to dismiss the CEOs if they spend less in R&D, suggesting a monitoring channel at work as well. Academic directors are associated with higher firm value at firms where innovation is more important but not at other firms. Overall, our results highlight the vital advising and monitoring roles academic directors play in corporate innovation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.