Abstract

Given the rapid development of corporate legislation, it is necessary to determine the boundaries of acceptable behavior when carrying out the procedure for distributing discovered property of a liquidated legal entity. The relevance of the topic is supported by both the increase in the number of applications for the appointment of the procedure received by commercial courts, especially during the economic downturn, and the increase in the number of abuses aimed at taking possession of the property of the corporation. There are gaps in the legal regulation of certain issues of the procedure: the circle of persons, the right to submit an application, the conditions of appointment, and control over the procedure. Stakeholders find opportunities to circumvent the law, leading to new types of abuse. In the absence of detailed legislative regulation, review of practice and clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, courts have to form judicial practice based on the circumstances of specific cases, which leads to contradictions in judicial practice. The stated problem is considered from the standpoint of its corporate component, while the author departs from the traditional circle of subjects of corporate law and examines abuses that can be committed by both participants and management, creditors and even an arbitrazh receiver. The paper lists the main types of abuse of rights, the definition of abuse of rights is proposed. The study is based on a comprehensive analysis of judicial practice related to the consideration of cases by commercial courts on applications for the appointment of a procedure.

Highlights

  • Given the rapid development of corporate legislation, it is necessary to determine the boundaries of acceptable behavior when carrying out the procedure for distributing discovered property of a liquidated legal entity

  • The relevance of the topic is supported by both the increase in the number of applications for the appointment of the procedure received by commercial courts, especially during the economic downturn, and the increase in the number of abuses aimed at taking possession of the property of the corporation

  • In the absence of detailed legislative regulation, review of practice and clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, courts have to form judicial practice based on the circumstances of specific cases, which leads to contradictions in judicial practice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В условиях стремительного развития корпоративного законодательства следует определить границы допустимого поведения при проведении процедуры распределения обнаруженного имущества ликвидированного юридического лица. В Арбитражный суд города Москвы поступило заявление о назначении процедуры распределения обнаруженного имущества ликвидированного юридического лица среди лиц, имеющих на это право (далее — процедура), которое впервые было рассмотрено судебным составом, специализирующимся на корпоративных спорах[3].

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.