Abstract

The long term survival of fecal indicator organisms (FIOs) and human pathogenic microorganisms in sediments is important from a water quality, human health and ecological perspective. Typically, both bacteria and viruses strongly associate with particulate matter present in freshwater, estuarine and marine environments. This association tends to be stronger in finer textured sediments and is strongly influenced by the type and quantity of clay minerals and organic matter present. Binding to particle surfaces promotes the persistence of bacteria in the environment by offering physical and chemical protection from biotic and abiotic stresses. How bacterial and viral viability and pathogenicity is influenced by surface attachment requires further study. Typically, long-term association with surfaces including sediments induces bacteria to enter a viable-but-non-culturable (VBNC) state. Inherent methodological challenges of quantifying VBNC bacteria may lead to the frequent under-reporting of their abundance in sediments. The implications of this in a quantitative risk assessment context remain unclear. Similarly, sediments can harbor significant amounts of enteric viruses, however, the factors regulating their persistence remains poorly understood. Quantification of viruses in sediment remains problematic due to our poor ability to recover intact viral particles from sediment surfaces (typically <10%), our inability to distinguish between infective and damaged (non-infective) viral particles, aggregation of viral particles, and inhibition during qPCR. This suggests that the true viral titre in sediments may be being vastly underestimated. In turn, this is limiting our ability to understand the fate and transport of viruses in sediments. Model systems (e.g., human cell culture) are also lacking for some key viruses, preventing our ability to evaluate the infectivity of viruses recovered from sediments (e.g., norovirus). The release of particle-bound bacteria and viruses into the water column during sediment resuspension also represents a risk to water quality. In conclusion, our poor process level understanding of viral/bacterial-sediment interactions combined with methodological challenges is limiting the accurate source apportionment and quantitative microbial risk assessment for pathogenic organisms associated with sediments in aquatic environments.

Highlights

  • There are a multitude of bacteria and viruses naturally present within the aquatic environment of which the vast majority are not derived from humans (Rosenwasser et al, 2016)

  • It is unlikely that environmental legislation will be widened to cover fecal indicator organisms (FIOs)/pathogens in sediments; understanding the fate of enteric and pathogenic viruses in the environment, including sediments, will be important for implementing potential viral standards

  • The influence of wastewater treatment works on viral abundance and infectivity, viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria, and the role of particulate matter and sediments on source/sinks of these organisms is still unclear

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

There are a multitude of bacteria and viruses naturally present within the aquatic environment of which the vast majority are not derived from humans (Rosenwasser et al, 2016). In coastal and estuarine environments, the survival of fecal indicator organisms (FIOs; indicating the potential presence of pathogenic bacteria and viruses) is positively linked to the concentration of suspended matter in the water column (Howell et al, 1996). The survival of human pathogenic bacteria and viruses in rivers and the marine environment is highly species and strain specific (Gerba et al, 1980; Anderson et al, 2005; Byappanahalli et al, 2006) This makes it difficult to generalize about the behavior of pathogenic organisms in a risk assessment context, when they may come from sources which vary both spatially and temporally. Staggemeier et al (2015a,b) directly compared the concentrations of adenoviruses in corresponding water and sediment samples derived from freshwater streams, dams, and springs and found that the viral abundance in sediment was significantly higher than in the overlying water. They found that adenoviruses may be present in sediment in the absence of the virus in the water

Method aim and calculation required Advantages
B DIRECT EXTRACTION OF VIRAL NUCLEIC ACIDS FOLLOWED BY QRT-PCR
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call