Abstracting gradual references

Abstract

Gradual typing is an effective approach to integrate static and dynamic typing, which supports the smooth transition between both extremes via the imprecision of type annotations. Gradual typing has been applied in many scenarios such as objects, subtyping, effects, ownership, typestates, information-flow typing, parametric polymorphism, etc. In particular, the combination of gradual typing and mutable references has been explored by different authors, giving rise to four different semantics—invariant, guarded, monotonic and permissive references. These semantics were specially crafted to reflect different design decisions with respect to precision and efficiency tradeoffs. Since then, progress has been made in the formulation of methodologies to systematically derive gradual counterparts of statically-typed languages, but these have not been applied to study mutable references. In this article, we explore how the Abstracting Gradual Typing (AGT) methodology, which has been shown to be effective in a variety of settings, applies to mutable references. Starting from a standard statically-typed language with references, we systematically derive with AGT a novel gradual language, called λ REF ˜ . We establish the properties of λ REF ˜ ; in particular, it is the first gradual language with mutable references that is proven to satisfy the gradual guarantee. We then compare λ REF ˜ with the main four existing approaches to gradual references, and show that the application of AGT does justify one of the proposed semantics: we formally prove that the treatment of references in λ REF ˜ corresponds to the guarded semantics, by presenting a bisimilation with the coercion semantics of Herman et al. In the process, we uncover that any direct application of AGT yields a gradual language that is not space-efficient. We consequently adjust the dynamic semantics of λ REF ˜ to recover space efficiency. We then show how to extend λ REF ˜ to support both monotonic and permissive references as well. Finally, we provide the first proof of the dynamic gradual guarantee for monotonic references. As a result, this paper sheds further light on the design space of gradual languages with mutable references and contributes to deepening the understanding of the AGT methodology. • Detailed application of the Abstracting Gradual Typing methodology (AGT) to a language with mutable references. • Establishes formal equivalence with guarded semantics of Herman et al. • Shows how to achieve space efficiency in the AGT-derived language. • Combines different gradual reference semantics in the same language. • First proof of the dynamic gradual guarantee for both guarded and monotonic references.