Abstract WP72: Telemedicine Access, Care, And Outcomes For TIA And Minor Stroke

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine is increasingly used, but its effectiveness for stroke prevention after minor stroke or TIA is not known. We compared the care and outcomes in patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with TIA or stroke before and after the implementation of telemedicine stroke prevention clinics in Ontario, Canada. We hypothesized that care and outcomes will remain similar. Methods: We used linked administrative data to identify community-dwelling adults discharged from the ED with TIA or ischemic stroke from April 2015 to March 2020 (pre-telemedicine) and April 2020 to March 2021 (post-telemedicine). We compared access to outpatient physician visits within 90 days, neuroimaging or vascular imaging within 14 days, and echocardiogram within 90 days using standardized differences (SD <0.1 indicates negligeable difference). We used Cox proportional hazard models to compare the adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals of death within 90 days pre- and post-telemedicine and cause-specific hazard models for stroke readmission with adjustment for comorbidities. Results: We identified 47,869 patients (n=40,099 pre- and n=7,770 post-telemedicine), median age 73 years [62, 82], 49% female. Baseline characteristics were similar. There was a rapid uptake in telemedicine use (Figure 1). Physician visits (92.9% vs 93.1%, SD 0.01), neuroimaging (81.3% vs 80.5%, SD 0.02), and echocardiogram use (52.5% vs 53.9% SD 0.03) were similar, but use of vascular imaging increased (74.8% vs 84.3% SD 0.24). Readmission for stroke was stable (3.9% vs 4.0%, aHR 1.00 [0.89, 1.13]), but 90-day death was higher post- compared to pre-telemedicine (2.8% vs 3.6%, aHR 1.19 [1.05, 1.36]). Conclusion: Telemedicine is a promising tool to support routine stroke prevention care. The higher mortality must be interpreted in the context of the COVID19 pandemic. Ongoing monitoring of stroke outcomes is needed.