Abstract
Introduction/Aim: We aimed to determine if CTA imaging using third generation reconstruction algorithm and lower contrast dose-low kVp technique (LD-CTA) was comparable to regular contrast dose CTA at 120 kVp using a sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm (ND-CTA). Methods: Retrospective imaging review of 100 consecutive patients (50 each in LD- and ND-CTA groups). Two readers independently assessed the subjective image quality across multiple vascular segments on a Likert-like scale. Contrast- and signal-to-noise ratios (CNR/ SNR) were compared for the mid-M1-MCA vessels bilaterally and the mid-basilar artery. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare subjective image quality. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the SNR/CNR values. Finally differences in contrast dose, CT-dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Both observers showed excellent correlation in subjective image quality (mean percentage agreement of 95.2% (84-100%) for group-1 versus 89.2% (82%-98%) for group-2). The subjective scores were not statistically different in the anterior circulation but showed significantly better image quality for the basilar artery. LD-CTA group showed significantly better SNR and CNR (p < 0.0001) for both MCA vessels and the basilar artery. ICC showed moderate correlation (0.51-0.63) between the observers. Student paired t-test did not show any significant difference between the observers. LD-CTA group also used lower contrast (49 cc versus 103 cc in ND-CTA) and had lower radiation exposure (DLP/ CTDI for both groups 268.3/12.42 vs 519.5/ 25.15, both < 0.0001). Conclusion: Next-generation reconstruction algorithm and low-Kv scanning significantly improved image quality on cerebral CTA images despite lower contrast dose, and in addition, have lower radiation exposure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have