Abstract WP46: Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Direct Triage Model Outcomes: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Introduction: There has been a shift in prehospital systems of care to prioritize transporting acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with suspected emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke to thrombectomy capable stroke centers (TSCs), as opposed to primary stroke centers (PSCs) which may be closer and offer intravenous thrombolysis faster. Large scale data on clinical outcomes in direct triage are lacking. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines with the Nested Knowledge AutoLit platform to search PubMed for relevant terms from 01/2015 to 05/2022. Our primary endpoint was proportion of patients with a good clinical outcome [modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-2] at 90 days. Results: We identified 390 studies, 16 of which compared direct triage to various models and were included. Amongst these, Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU; n=1), Mothership only (n=1), Drip-and-Ship only (n=3), and Mothership + Drip-and-Ship (n=11) were compared to Direct Triage. Among the eleven that reported 90-day functional status outcomes, there were no discernible trends. Four studies that compared 90-day functional outcomes amongst patients who received EVT and compared Direct Triage to Drip-and-Ship + Mothership models were analyzed. Baseline age, sex, and presenting NIHSS were similar. Patients who underwent Direct Triage were more likely to have a good outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90-days (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03-1.76). Conclusions: Amongst patients who received EVT, patients who underwent Direct Triage were more likely to have better functional outcomes at 90 days. Direct Triage of AIS patients is a promising strategy to improve clinical outcomes in patients who undergo EVT. More research is needed in patients who do not receive EVT.