Abstract

Background and Study Purpose: Existing guidelines on endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke do not include isolated cervical internal carotid artery occlusions (CICAO). These occlusions are still treated, but the effect remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes between patients with isolated CICAO and patients who underwent EVT due to occlusions mentioned in guidelines. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 1162 patients who underwent EVT due to ischemic stroke at Aarhus University Hospital between June 2017 and June 2022. Univariate analysis of outcomes and baseline characteristics were compared between patients with isolated CICAO and tandem occlusions or isolated CICAO and occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (M1)/intracerebral internal carotid artery (ICA-T). Results: 731 patients were eligible for inclusion. Patients with isolated CICAO were more likely male (67.8% vs 50.9%, p-value = 0.0009) and active smokers (42.2% vs 26.4%, p = 0.0016) compared to patients with M1/ICA-T occlusions where atrial fibrillation (35.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.0158) and an equal sex distribution was more frequently seen. The groups showed similar favorable outcomes and mortality. Notably, a statistically significant difference in mortality between patients with isolated CICAO (precent) and M1/ICA-T occlusions (percent) could not be excluded (p = 0.0584). Conclusion: Patients with isolated CICAO and M1/ICA-T occlusions seem to differ in sex, smoking status, and atrial fibrillation. This study did not find any differences between isolated CICAO and tandem occlusions. EVT appears beneficial in patients with isolated CICAO, however randomized-controlled trials are necessary to examine and compare the effect between occlusion sites.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.