Abstract

Background: Recent trials have shown benefit of thrombectomy in carefully selected patients in the extended (>6 hours) window. However, it is not clear if the outcomes differ from those undergoing thrombectomy in the conventional (0-6 hours) window. We sought to evaluate if time to treatment modifies the effect of endovascular reperfusion in stroke patients with evidence of salvageable tissue on CT perfusion (CTP). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients who underwent thrombectomy in a single center cohort. Demographics, comorbidities, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), vessel occlusion location, onset to skin puncture time, core infarct volume on initial CTP, recanalization (mTICI IIb/III) rates, final infarct volume and modified rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days were compared between patients who underwent thrombectomy in conventional (0-6 hours) and extended (>6 hour) window. Results: 119 patients were studied of which 55% were female. Univariate analysis showed that the groups (Conventional vs. Extended) were balanced for age (p=0.37), NIHSS (p=0.35), vessel occlusion location (p=0.51), initial core infarct volume (p=0.64) and recanalization (mTICI IIb/III) rates (p=0.55). Final infarct volume (p=0.18) and favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (p=0.65) were similar. Shift analysis did not reveal any significant difference in 90 day outcome (p=0.34). (Figure) After adjustment; age (p=0.004) and final infarct volume (p<0.001) were predictive of favorable outcome. Conclusion: Tissue based selection with CTP for thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke is independent of onset time for favorable functional outcome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.