Abstract WP173: Children’s Post-Stroke Expressive Language Outcomes Are Affected By Bilingual Exposure

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 2/3 of children face neurological deficits following arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). In neurotypical development, bilingualism is thought to confer certain linguistic and cognitive advantages. However, research on whether this may affect development in bilingual pediatric stroke patients is scarce. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of bilingual vs. monolingual exposure on language and cognitive outcomes in children following arterial ischemic stroke across two studies: (1) large-scale group analysis using the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure (PSOM); (2) exploratory case studies using neuropsychological measures. Methods: An institutional stroke registry and chart review were used to gather patient and stroke data, including the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure (PSOM) and standardized neuropsychological measures performed at several timepoints post-stroke in children with AIS. In Study 1, growth curve modeling based on PSOM subscales, predicted by age at stroke groups, language groups and their interactions was used. In Study 2, comparative case studies were conducted with a monolingual-bilingual pair, aged 7 and 8 at stroke onset. Results: In Study 1, 237 patients were identified (44%, bilingual patients). Patients were stratified based on age at stroke onset i.e. neonatal (<28 days of life), first-year (28 days-12 months) and childhood (13 months - 18 years). On the PSOM’s language expression subscale, an interaction revealed better post-stroke outcomes among bilingual children aged 1-12 months at stroke (beta = -0.32, t =-2.33, p = 0.02). In Study 2, the bilingual’s performance on neuropsychological assessments corroborated findings of Study 1, favoring a recovery of expressive language. Conclusion: Overall, we found no negative consequences of a bilingual environment on post-stroke outcomes. Additionally, it is possible that bilingualism has a faciliatory effect on expressive language development post-stroke. Further research should evaluate linguistic advantage effects prospectively in bilingual children with stroke and a control group.