Abstract
Introduction: Extracranial Internal carotid artery (ExICA) stenting may be required during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (ACLVO) with coexisting ExICA steno-occlusive disease. We sought to evaluate the safety of acute dual antiplatelet therapy (DAP) in this high-risk MT subgroup. Methods: Consecutive ACLVO patients treated with MT were evaluated during a five-year period. All patients receiving ExICA stenting during MT were also acutely treated with DAP coupled with heparin or eptifibatide drips. Baseline stroke severity and early hypodensity on baseline CT were assessed using NIHSS-score and ASPECTS. Complete reperfusion (CR) was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grades IIb/III) at the end of MT. Final infarct volume (FIV) on brain MRI was assessed at 24-48 hours using standardized methodology. Safety outcomes included symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (sICH) documented by SITS-MOST criteria, infarct in new unaffected territory (INT) determined according to ESCAPE trial methodology and three-month mortality. We also assessed 3-month functional outcomes using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. Results: Among 309 ACLVO patients treated with MT, 24 received additional ExICA stenting. Eptifibatide and heparin drips were administered in 15 (65% of stenting subgroup: 9 patients: aspirin + clopidogrel, 6 patients: aspirin + ticagrelor) and 8 (35% of stenting subgroup: 6 patients: aspirin + clopidogrel, 2 patients: aspirin + ticagrelor) cases respectively. Patients with and without ExICA stenting had similar (p>0.1) median baseline NIHSS-scores (15 vs. 16 points) and ASPECTS (10 vs. 10 points). The two groups did not differ (p>0.1) in terms of median FIV (20 vs. 15 cm 3 ) and median 3-month mRS-scores (2 vs. 2). Patients with ExICA stenting had similar (p>0.1) rates of sICH (5% vs. 8%), INT (0% vs. 9%), CR (74% vs. 70%) and 3-month mRS-scores of 0-2 (55% vs. 51%) compared to the rest. Conclusions: DAP coupled with eptifibatide or heparin drips does not appear to increase peri-procedural complications or to worsen clinical outcome of ELVO patients treated with MT and ExICA stenting.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.