Abstract WP123: Comparison Of Surgical Versus Medical Therapy In Malignant Posterior Circulation Infarction: A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Whilst surgical decompression in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction is well established, its role in malignant posterior circulation infarction (MPCI) is unclear. Recent small cohort studies suggest that neurosurgery in this group may be beneficial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes of MPCI patients undergoing surgical intervention versus medical therapy. Methods: Medline, Embase and Cochrane were searched from inception until 2 April 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated patients with posterior circulation stroke treated with neurosurgical intervention. Observational cohort studies and case series with death and functional outcome data were included. Death was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 1 and modified Rankin scale (mRS) 6, or extracted from the text. Favourable functional outcome was defined as mRS 0-2, GOS 4-5, Barthel Index 91-100 or extracted from text at the latest follow-up period. 6673 studies were filtered, with 31 studies included for data extraction, of which 8 studies included both a surgical and medical therapy group. Random effects meta-analysis, analysis of proportions and meta-regression were performed. Results: The medical therapy cohort (n=235) had significantly better odds of good functional outcome (GFO) than the surgical cohort. There was no significant difference in odds of death between the two groups (Figure 1). Amongst surgical patients (n=184), 18% died and 55% had GFO. On meta-regression, the proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation and hydrocephalus was negatively associated with odds of death and GFO respectively (both p<0.05). Conclusion: In patients with MPCI, neurosurgery did not improve functional outcome or mortality in comparison with medical therapy. Larger cohort studies are warranted to resolve this clinical equipoise.