Abstract WP11: Comparative Safety and Efficacy of the Trevo, Penumbra and Solitaire Devices in Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing rates of recanalization, good neurological outcome, and mortality between patients treated with three modern devices used for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search on studies reporting outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We selected studies including≥30 patients treated with either the Trevo stent-retriever, Penumbra aspiration system or the Solitaire stent-retriever. Outcomes studied included mrs≤2, 90-day mortality, symptomatic and intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), recanalization. Outcomes were pooled across studies using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: 27 articles with 2666 patients were included (1514 Solitaire, 260 Trevo and 892 Penumbra). Rates of good neurological outcome (mRS≤2) were higher in the Solitaire group (54.0%, 95%CI=49.0-58.0%) than the Penumbra group (39.0%, 95%CI=31.0%-47.0%) (P<0.01). There was a trend towards higher rates of good neurological outcome in the Solitaire compared to the Trevo group (P=0.08). Rates of 90-day mortality were significantly lower in the Solitaire group (16.0%, 95%CI=11.0%-22.0%) than in the Penumbra group (27.0%, 95%CI=24.0%-30.0%) (P<0.01) and the Trevo group (23.0%, 95%CI=13.0-33.0)(P=0.01). Recanalization rates were similar between groups at 80.0% (95%CI=75.0%-84.0% for the Solitaire group, 82.0% (95%CI=75.0%-88.0%) for the Penumbra group (P=0.54) and 76.0% (95%CI=68.0-83.0) for the Trevo group (P=0.13 vs Penumbra and P=0.27 vs. Solitaire). Conclusions: Meta-analysis of incidence rates in noncomparative series reporting on over 2500 patients suggests that the Solitaire device maybe associated with superior neurological outcomes and lower rates of 90-day mortality. Comparative studies are needed to confirm these observations.