Abstract WP105: A Practical Wake up Tpa Protocol at a United States Based Comprehensive Stroke Center Hub and Its Telestroke Spokes

Abstract

Background: IV tPA is established as an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Currently it is endorsed up to 4.5 hours of last known well time by major guidelines. A randomized trial, WAKE-UP, displayed its safety and efficacy in patients who presented within 4.5 hours of waking up with their symptoms. Objective: To establish a practical tPA protocol for patients who wake up or are found with stroke symptoms at a large Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) and its 13 telestroke spokes (TS) based on the WAKE-UP trial. Methods: A wake up tPA protocol was created and given to all teleneurologists. Door to needle times (DTN) and reasons for no tPA were collected for 12 months post implementation and evaluated for differences between wake up (WU) and non-wake up (NW) patients. Results: 93 WU patients were identified; 23 at CSC and 70 at TS. 11 (47.8%) vs. 4 (5.7%) patients received tPA at CSC and TS, respectively. Median DTN was not significantly different for WU patients at CSC vs. TS (64 vs. 89 mins, p=0.54). Median DTN at CSC was shorter for NW vs. WU (37 vs. 64 mins; p=0.003). Similarly, median DTN at TS trended toward being shorter for NW vs. WU (44 vs. 89 mins; p=0.062). The reasons for no tPA at CSC were no mismatch found in 6 (50%), and MRI unavailability in 6 (50%); at TS were no mismatch found in 11 (16.6%), MRI unavailability in 54 (81,1%) and MRI was contraindicated in 1 (1.5%). Conclusion: Treating WU patients using a CSC Hub and TS model is feasible. DTN are longer for WU vs. NW. In the United States, MRI availability is the main barrier to WU tPA at both CSC and community hospitals. The difference between median DTN for WU between CSC and TS did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the small sample size.