Abstract
Introduction: Two recent RCTs have shown benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) 6-24 h from last known well (LKW) using imaging-guided patient selection, however little is known about outcomes in contemporary non-trial settings. We assessed the frequency and outcomes of EVT beyond 6 h in the US national GWTG-Stroke clinical registry. Methods: We analyzed all AIS hospitalizations between 1/1/09 - 10/1/18 at fully participating GWTG-Stroke sites to identify 53,702 patients at 697 sites treated with EVT (± IV tPA) who had valid LKW, symptom discovery (SxD) and treatment times recorded. Hospital characteristics were analyzed at the 470 sites that treated > 10 patients during the study. Table 1 shows significant covariates (standardized differences >10%) and adjusted outcomes based on logistic regression models. Results: Treatment >6 h from LKW occurred in 33% of all EVT cases (median 4.7 h, IQR 3.3-7 h), and all were treated <6 h from SxD. The proportion of EVT cases treated >6 h from LKW varied widely across sites (median 30%, IQR 24-38%) and increased sharply in 2018 (Fig). Compared to < 6 h, patients treated >6 h differed in age, AF, arrival mode/time, stroke severity and use of anticoagulation, and presented to higher EVT volume centers. Late window EVT patients had less favorable adjusted outcomes at discharge for mortality, ambulation and disposition to home or IRF compared to <6 h patients (Table). Conclusions: EVT is frequently performed >6h, accounting for one-third of cases nationally. As adjusted functional outcomes at discharge are worse in these patients, further research is required to ensure optimal EVT outcomes in clinical practice settings
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.