Abstract WMP7: Impact of Telestroke Access in a Rural Setting

Abstract

Background: Despite decades long adoption as the standard-of-care for ischemic stroke, the majority of eligible patients do not receive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), with underutilization especially pronounced in rural areas. Telestroke, however, may help alleviate this geographical healthcare disparity. The current study aims to identify the impact of implementing a mature telestroke network within a rural setting. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained telestroke database from a large rural tertiary care comprehensive stroke center covering 31 spoke hospitals spanning critical access hospitals to primary stroke centers between 10/2021-02/2023. Data was compared to a previous review period (01/2016-12/2018; comprised of 8 spokes) and the statewide IVT rates recorded in GWTG. Data analysis conducted via descriptive statistics and Fisher’s (two-tailed) exact test. Results: 1801 telestroke consults were performed; 41.4% (746/1801) were ineligible for acute stroke intervention. 39% (410/1055) of eligible patients were treated with IVT (vs. 33% [317/959] previously, p = 0.068), representing 58% (410/708; vs 24% [107/448] previously, p < 0.001) of statewide total IVT administration. Symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH) was 3.0%, overall 30-day mortality was 5.6%, and sICH mortality was 1.0%. IVT deferred most commonly: low NIH (44%), mimics (21%), coagulopathy (8%), followed by other. 22% (396/1801) of total consults were transferred from the originating site (vs. 34% [305/890] previously, p < 0.0001) of which 10% (42/396) underwent EVT. Discussion: The impact of expanding a rural telestroke network continued to produce high IVT rates (nearly double the national average) with safety outcomes (sICH, mortality) at or below national standards. Additionally, a large network has significantly increased the proportion of patients remaining at originating sites, optimizing both tertiary and local centers’ resources. The value of a regional telestroke hub is further underscored by the significant increase in statewide IVT attributed to network consults. However, further strategies are needed to better educate rural providers on acute stroke to reduce the rate of ineligible consults and streamline use of telestroke services.