Abstract

Background: Our level 1 stroke center has developed a standardized protocol, which has allowed us to achieve a median door-to-recanalization time of less than 60 minutes. In order to achieve such rapid recanalization rates, the neuro-interventional team is called in to meet the stroke patient upon their arrival to the hospital. We will describe our protocol for achieving rapid recanalization, and we will discuss the cost. Methods: For the last 18 months, while performing more than 300 thrombectomies, we have achieved a median door-to-recanalization time of < 60 minutes. Standardized protocols have contributed to this rapid time metric, but the most important contribution to time savings was calling in the neuro-interventional team to meet the patient upon their arrival to the emergency room. The neuro-interventional team called in to meet the patient includes: 1 RN, 2 technologists, 1 anesthesiologist and 1 neurointerventional surgeon. We will analyze time metrics, the percent of neuro-interventional stroke alerts that proceed to thrombectomy and the personnel costs for this protocol in this consecutive cohort of patients. Results: From 1/1/2017 – 3/31/2018, there were 1162 ELVO activations of the neuro-interventional team. Of these alerts, 314 proceeded to thrombectomy, equal to a 27% rate of thrombectomy. This rate was 21% during weekday working hours, 43% after 5 PM on weekdays, and 29% on weekends. If a thrombectomy is not performed, the RN and technologists are each paid 2 hours of overtime pay. Not counting hours lost in daytime productivity, physician time, and hours of lost sleep, there were more than 5000 hours paid to the RNs and technologists for these alerts that did not proceed to thrombectomy, totaling > $200,000.00 in overtime pay. The median time from patient arrival to recanalization was 52 minutes. The median time from door to groin puncture was 34.5 minutes, and from groin puncture to recanalization was 17.5 minutes. Conclusion: Rapid and safe revascularization helps achieve the best clinical outcomes in ELVO patients, and our stroke systems of care need to be streamlined to achieve these rapid time metrics, but it comes at a cost. Cost benefit analysis suggests in house neurointerventional teams may be needed to take care of these patients best.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.