Abstract WMP20: Effect of Leukoaraiosis on Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy and Proposed New Leukoaraiosis-Aspects Score

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Leukoaraiosis is a poor prognostic marker for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study sought to assess if severity of leukoaraiosis is associated with outcome in patients with AIS following endovascular thrombectomy, and to propose a leukoaraiosis-related modification to the ASPECTS score to improve its predictive value for good outcome. Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients with AIS that underwent mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion at our comprehensive stroke center. Leukoaraiosis burden was graded using the Fazekas scale (combined scores from two locations categorically divided into no leukoaraiosis (score = 0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4) and severe (5-6)). The primary outcome measure was 90-day mRS. A proposed Leukoaraiosis-ASPECTS (“L-ASPECTS”) was calculated by subtracting values from the traditional ASPECT based on leukoaraiosis severity (1 point subtracted if mild, 2 if moderate, 3 if severe). Results: Of 174 included patients, 89 (51.2%) were female; average age was 68.0±9.1. 28 (16.1%) had no leukoaraiosis, 66 (37.9%) had mild, 62 (35.6%) had moderate, and 18 (10.3%) had severe. Leukoaraiosis severity was associated with worse 90-day mRS among all patients (p=0.0005) as well as those that were successfully revascularized (p=0.0002). A multivariate analysis confirmed that leukoaraiosis burden was associated with worse 90-day mRS among all patients (mild: p=0.006; moderate: p=0.002; severe: p=0.03), as well as those that underwent successful thrombectomies (p=0.005). Both L-ASPECTS and ASPECTS were associated with poor outcomes, but the association was stronger with L-ASPECTS (p<0.0001 and AUC=0.7 for L-ASPECTS; p=0.04 and AUC=0.59 for ASPECTS). Conclusion: Leukoaraiosis severity on pre-mechanical thrombectomy NCCT is associated with worse 90-day outcome in patients with AIS following endovascular recanalization, and is an independent risk factor for worse outcomes. A proposed L-ASPECTS score had stronger association with outcome than the traditional ASPECTS score.