Abstract TP82: Gaps In Clinical History And Diagnostic Evaluation For Young Women With Ischemic Stroke - We Need An Updated Approach

Abstract

Introduction: Young women with stroke represent a unique patient population. There are a variety of sex-specific etiologies that warrant a different approach to evaluation and secondary prevention in young women. Secondary prevention begins during the acute hospitalization, thus, certain aspects of the history and evaluations may be indicated early after stroke. We describe our center’s experience with young women presenting with stroke over a 2.5-year period. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of women between 18-45 years, identified from our stroke registry (1/2015 to 5/2018). An assessment of key variables regarding common stroke risk factors (RFs), sex-specific RFs, (pregnancy history, estrogen use, migraine, autoimmune conditions) and workup (pregnancy test, hypercoagulable states, substance use) was conducted. Results: Of 198 women with acute ischemic stroke in our study period, medical RFs of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and atrial fibrillation were each ascertained for more than 98% of women. Lifestyle RFs of tobacco use and alcohol use were reported for 85.9% and 87.6%, respectively and urine drug screens were performed in 67%. Obstetric history (gravida/para) was obtained in only 19.7%, pregnancy tests were conducted in 69.2%, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were only reported in patients who were pregnant (2%) or post-partum (5.6%). Oral contraceptive (OCP) or hormone replacement (HRT) was reported in 6.6% and migraine with or without aura in 12.6%. Among 76 patients (38.4%) with cryptogenic stroke, obstetric history was reported in only 25%, OCP/HRT use in 5.3%, and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome was assessed in 64%. Conclusion: The acute stroke hospitalization is a critical period for identification of stroke etiology and assessment of cardiovascular risk. There are known sex disparities in standard evaluation and management of stroke. In pre-menopausal women, gaps in care may be even greater if the history and assessment are not completed with sex-specific variables in mind. We suggest a standard approach to the history and assessment of young women. We plan to implement this approach in our patient population while tracking the impact on care.