Abstract TP198: The Impact of Regular Employments on Hyper-Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose: We aimed to investigate the differences in weekly variations of stroke occurrence between hyper-acute ischemic stroke patients with and without regular employments (RE), and the impact of RE on outcome. Methods: Consecutive symptomatic ischemic stroke patients with < 4.5 h from onset to door between October 2012 and May 2018 were enrolled. All the situations of employment on admission were obtained from interviews with the participant or substitute guardians. First, we divided the patients into with and without RE to evaluate the differences in weekly variations of stroke occurrence. Second, we divided the same patients into with and without favorable outcome (mRS score of 0 to 2 at 3 months from the onset) to evaluate the impact of RE on outcome. Results: We screened 1,249 consecutive symptomatic ischemic stroke patients, including 385 patients (292 (76%) male, median age 67 years) with hyper-acute ischemic stroke. Of all, 251 patients (65%) were included in RE group. In the multivariate analysis, patients with RE were more likely to develop strokes on Monday compared to that on Sunday and public holiday (OR 2.841, 95% CI 1.145-7,049, p = 0.024, Figure A). In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with favorable outcome were low NIHSS score on admission (OR 0.909, 95% CI 0.857-0.964, p = 0.001), not receiving endovascular therapy (OR 0.175 95% CI 0.069-0.444, p <0.001), and having RE (OR 2.506, 95% CI 1.049-5.986, p = 0.039, Figure B). Conclusions: There were dramatic differences in weekly variations of hyper-acute ischemic stroke occurrence between patients with and without RE. Monday seems to be “a black day” for ischemic stroke patients with RE. RE had a positive impact on outcome in hyper-acute ischemic stroke.