Abstract TP147: Quantitative Measures of Strength and Synergy Differentiate Individuals With Chronic Stroke With and Without Clinically Detectable Elbow Contracture

Abstract

Many individuals with chronic stroke demonstrate contracture of the elbow flexors. The development of contracture may be attributable to underlying impairments such as weakness, flexion synergy, and hyperactive reflexes. This study explored differences in motor impairment and function between 17 individuals with clinically detectable elbow flexor contracture and 17 individuals with full passive range of motion. The groups did not differ in age (61.61 ± 7.99, 55.06 ± 12.48, p = 0.078), years post-stroke (12.92 ± 9.34, 10.60 ± 7.16, p = 0.423), or Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment score (FMA, 26.35 ± 5.86, 26.47 ± 8.70, p = 0.963). The passive range limitation in the contracture group was 3 to 36° (11.65 ± 8.30°). Kinetics, kinematics, and EMG were used to quantify four motor impairments and reaching function. Shoulder abduction and elbow extension strength were measured isometrically and normalized to the unaffected side. Flexion synergy was quantified as a force-based measure assessing independent joint control. Flexor spasticity was quantified while reaching at 50% of maximum shoulder abduction as the change in biceps EMG from reach onset to peak angular velocity, normalized by maximal EMG activity. Reaching function was defined as maximum reaching distance against gravity and normalized by target distance (-10° of full extension). The groups differed in elbow extension strength (Contracture, 0.315 ± 0.129; No contracture, 0.559 ± 0.153; p < 0.001) and flexion synergy (0.146 ± 0.186, 0.397 ± 0.229, p = 0.009). The groups did not differ in shoulder abduction strength (0.500 ± 0.174, 0.615 ± 0.199, p = 0.080), flexor spasticity (0.079 ± 0.090, 0.056 ± 0.115, p = 0.523), or reaching function (0.501 ± 0.391, 0.714 ± 0.296, p = 0.082). The findings of this study suggest a relationship between elbow contracture and the concurrent presence of elbow extension weakness and flexion synergy. The quantitative measure of reaching function will likely differentiate individuals with and without contracture if the assessment is modified so that the standardized reaching target is located at 0° of elbow extension (normal range). Future research should use quantitative metrics to further explore the temporal recovery of impairments in order to prevent the development of contracture.