Abstract TMP61: Induced Hypertension in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background and Objectives: It is unclear whether induced hypertension in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may improve long-term outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of induced hypertension vs standard medical care in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched PubMed using the prespecified terms “induced hypertension” or “blood pressure augmentation” plus “ischemic stroke” for clinical trials that reported functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI across trials were synthesized using fixed-effect model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. Forest plots were constructed. Results: Three clinical trials with 270 AIS patients treated with induced hypertension (n=126) or standard medical care (n= 144) were included. Mean age was 66.6 years, 35.2% were women, and the mean initial NIHSS was 7.5. The rate of functional independence at 90 days was higher in patients treated with induced hypertension (70.6%) versus control (54.9%) (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.13-3.11; p=0.01). sICH did not differ between patients treated with induced hypertension (<1%) versus control (<1%) (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.14-7.45; p=0.98). Discussion: Among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with 72 hours of symptoms onset, induced hypertension resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than standard medical care and did not increase risk of sICH. Large RCTs to test this observation are ongoing and needed to guide clinical practice.