Abstract TMP47: Identifying and Categorizing Delays to Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions

Abstract

Introduction: Early endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusions (LVO) is associated with better outcomes. Identifying and categorizing delays to EVT may reveal areas for improvement. Methods: We prospectively identified all patients who underwent EVT at our hospital between May 2022 - 2023. We determined eight steps in acute care: arrival, imaging, IR activation, ED release, arrival to IR, groin puncture, first pass, and recanalization. We classified patients as delayed if any interval exceeded their rolling six-month median. We created 12 categories and 36 subcategories of delays. We used t-test and odds ratios to compare intervals and outcomes between delayed and non-delayed patients. We analyzed subgroups based on causes of delay and location of presentation. Results: Out of 183 LVO patients who underwent EVT, 111 (61%) were delayed. There were no significant differences in age, gender, last known normal to arrival, NIHSS, thrombolytic use, or TICI scale. The delayed group had higher door to groin (99 min), door to device (126 min), and door to recanalization (159 min) compared to the non-delayed group (40, 65, 81 min; p < 0.001). The most common causes of delay were: general case complexity (20%), which was associated with higher door to imaging (59 min, p < 0.001) and imaging to IR activation (37 min, p = 0.03); after hours presentation (19%), which was associated with higher door to imaging (53 min, p = 0.02) and imaging to IR activation (36 min, p = 0.01); and procedural complexity (18%) which was associated with higher groin to device (34 min, p < 0.001) and device to recanalization (53 min, p < 0.001) when compared to other causes of delay. Between the delayed and non-delayed group, there was no significant difference in the length of stay, change in NIHSS at discharge, in-hospital mortality, disposition, or 90-day mRS. Subgroup analysis showed a trend towards higher mortality in delayed patients who presented after hours (OR 3.60 (CI) 0.92-14.10) or in-hospital (OR 2.41 (CI) 0.57-10.19). Conclusions: We determined seven intervals where delays can occur between arrival and recanalization of LVO patients. We created a system for categorizing delays that showed areas for improvement including after hours and in-hospital stroke evaluation.