Abstract PS17-27: Molecular evaluation of immunogenicity and genomic alterations in invasive lobular breast cancer

Abstract

Abstract Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of invasive breast cancer and accounts for 10-15% of all cases. Though ILC has distinct clinical, prognostic and molecular features, studies are limited and include few patients. ILCs show a decreased response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and an increased resistance to endocrine therapy. Thus, there is a great need to identify alternative therapies, such as immunotherapy, that could improve overall survival. Success of immunotherapy largely depends on tumor immunogenicity which varies with histologic type. Determination of predictive and prognostic biomarkers for ILC will help determine who can benefit the most. Our study investigates canonical markers of immunogenicity - PD-L1 expression and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) - in patients with ILC compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We further correlate these markers in different subtypes i.e. hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 positive (HER2+), and in triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). We also analyze differences in immune cell profiles constituting the tumor microenvironment (TME) and differences in genomic alterations between ILC and IDC. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed to identify breast cancer tumors with ILC or IDC histology profiled at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) that were tested for PD-L1 by SP142 assay and had whole transcriptome sequencing data available. ILC and IDC cases were further subtyped as HR+ and HER2+ and TNBC. PD-L1 expression in immune cell was assessed using Ventana PD-L1 (SP142) histochemical assay and PD-L1 expression in tumor cell was assessed by laboratory developed test using SP142 clone with staining higher than 2+ considered positive. TMB was measured by counting somatic non-synonymous missense mutations on the 592 gene panel (Nextseq) next generation sequencing (NGS) assay, and ≥ 10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb) was considered high. Using the whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (NovaSeq) data we analyzed the difference in immune cell profiles constituting the TME using a computational RNA deconvolution approach. NGS was used to identify significant differences in genomic alterations between ILC and IDC. Results: We identified 1,359 breast cancer patients (ILC: 194 vs IDC: 1,165). Among ILC, 79% were HR +, 11% TNBC, <2% HER2+ and the rest were of unclear subtype, compared to 55% HR +, 31% TNBC, 10% HER2+ in the IDC group. PD-L1 expression in immune cells was lower in ILC (PD-L1≥ 1% ILC: 13% vs. IDC: 35% p <0.0001; PD-L1>10% ILC: 1% vs. IDC: 5% p=0.017). PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was also lower in ILC (ILC 1% vs IDC 5%; p =0.0136). All subtypes of ILC had lower PD-L1 expression in immune and tumor cells when compared to IDC. TMB was similar and comparable in IDC and ILC (median TMB 7 mut/Mb). Assessment of TME showed a significantly increased abundance of cytotoxic lymphocytes and monocytic cells in IDC, and stromal endothelial cells in ILC. Androgen receptor (AR) expression, and mutations in CDH1 (ILC 76% vs IDC 2%) and PIK3CA (ILC 44% vs IDC 30%) were more common in ILC. CDH1 mutation was significantly higher in both TN ILC (ILC 60% vs IDC 1%; p<0.05) and HR+ ILC (77% vs IDC 2%; p<0.05) subtypes of ILC. TP53 mutation was lower in ILC (ILC 26% vs IDC 65%) irrespective of subtype. Conclusion: In summary, PD-L1 expression in immune cells and tumor cells was lower in ILC, however TMB was comparable between ILC and IDC. Immune cell profiling supports a cold or less immunogenic TME for ILC. A composite immune biomarker may be able to better characterize immunogenicity of ILC. Citation Format: Upama Giri, Joanne Xiu, Tatiana Karadimitriou, Sofi Castanon, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Paula Pohlmann, Elias Obeid, Jasgit Sachdev, Elisa Krill-Jackson, Michael Simon, Antoinette Tan, Neelima Denduluri, Lee Schwartzberg, Michael Korn, Evanthia T Roussos Torres. Molecular evaluation of immunogenicity and genomic alterations in invasive lobular breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-27.