Abstract PO5-08-10: Breast cancer risk prediction performance of polygenic risk score in Taiwanese female with dense breast: A nested case-control study

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in Taiwan and the incidence rate of breast cancer has been increasing steadily over the past 30 years. To address this, a nationwide screening program with biennial mammography for women aged 40-69 was implemented in 2004, which has contributed to a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality. Asian women are more likely to have dense breast tissue, and studies have shown a correlation between breast density and the risk of developing breast cancer, with higher breast density values associated with increased risk. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are calculated based on an individual's genetic information and can estimate their risk of developing a particular disease. Although PRS can identify low-penetrance risk variants, its use in breast cancer risk estimation is typically limited to gene-only models, and integration with breast cancer screening databases is rare. Hence, the aim of this specific study was to evaluate the predictive capacity of PRS in women with dense breast tissue by exploring potential genetic markers and constructing a PRS to investigate the genetic factors associated with clinical characteristics and the risk of developing breast cancer. Methods: The PRS was developed using genetic information from the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative genotyping data. A total of 6335 patients were enrolled, and 101 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as candidate markers based on the PGS Catalog (PGS000001). Clinical characteristics of the study cohort were summarised using median and range, or frequency and percentage. The distribution of characteristics between breast cancer and controls was estimated using an independent two-sample t-test, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test. The association of the PRS and related characteristics with breast cancer risk in the study cohort was estimated using univariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression. Harrel’s C-index was reported to demonstrate the predictive performance of PRS in both univariate and multivariate models. All p-values were two-sided, and a p less than .05 is considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using R 4.1.2 (R core team, 2023) Results: The results showed that breast cancer patients constituted a higher proportion of individuals in PRS Q4 (37.8% vs 24.8% in controls). The model's predictive performance for breast cancer risk increased from 0.565 (95% CI = 0.520-0.611) to 0.699 (95% CI = 0.644-0.755) by adding related clinical characteristics compared to the PRS-only model. Patients characterized with benign breast disease (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.31-0.79, P = 0.004) showed a decreased breast cancer risk, and patients with mastalgia or palpable breast lesion (OR = 6.87, 95% CI = 4.29-10.8, P < 0.001) predicted significant greater breast cancer risk. Subgroup analysis of patients without breast symptoms was conducted as they may be overlooked or underestimated for breast cancer screening. For dense breast patients without symptoms, the high PRS group (Q4) consistently showed a significantly elevated breast cancer risk compared to the low PRS group (Q1-Q3) in both univariate (OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.43-3.50, P < 0.001) and multivariate analyses (OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.41-3.46, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Breast cancer screening has undergone a shift from a general approach to a personalized, risk-based approach. Besides breast cancer screening using family history as the only risk factor, our proposed model identifies both genetic and clinical risk factors using big data analyses including the EHR, cancer screening, and registry from a single institute. The study suggests that integrating PRS into personalized screening strategies could improve risk prediction for Taiwanese females with dense breasts without prominent symptoms. Table 1. Clinical characteristics of study cohort (n=6335). Table 2. Association of the PRS quartiles in breast cancer risk. Table 3. Predictive performance of PRS for breast cancer risk. Citation Format: Chih Yean Lum, Chih Chiang Hung, Chi-Cheng Huang, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Sin-Hua Moi. Breast cancer risk prediction performance of polygenic risk score in Taiwanese female with dense breast: A nested case-control study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-08-10.