Abstract P6-09-01: Central Ki67 analysis as a predictor for adjuvant capecitabine efficacy in early breast cancer (EBC) subtypes in US oncology trial 01062

Abstract

Abstract Background: USON 01062 (O’Shaughnessy J, et al. Proc SABCS, 2010, abst S4-2) showed no improvement in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) (median FU 5 yrs: HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.67-1.05; p = 0.125) with the addition of capecitabine (X) to standard adjuvant chemotherapy, but showed improvement in OS (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92; p = 0.011). Exploratory analysis of local pathology-assessed Ki67 suggested benefit from adjuvant X in pts with more highly proliferative cancers with Ki67 ≥ 10% (Pippen J et al. Proc ASCO, 2011, abst 500). The objective of this study is to determine whether centrally-performed Ki67 IHC results corroborate or refute this finding. Methods: 2610 pts with resected high risk EBC were randomized to receive 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2) IV every 3 wks for 4 cycles followed by either docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV or docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV plus X 825mg/m2 PO bid for 14 days every 3 wks for 4 cycles. Archival primary breast cancer tissue was collected on 2000 pts for predictive biomarker analyses. Central Ki67 IHC was performed using the anti-Ki67 monoclonal antibody SP6 and was read by one pathologist (HK) according to published recommendations (Dowsett M, et al. JNCI 103:1-9, 2011). Results: Central Ki67 IHC has been performed on 1440 pts who had centrally-validated informed consents. The distribution of% Ki67-positive cells by locally-assessed ER/HER2 subtype is shown below. 45% of HR+ HER2- BCs had a Ki67 ≤ 10%, while 24% had a Ki67 11% to 20%, and 31% had a Ki67 > 20%. The concordance between the local vs central Ki67 results was low at 46% for Ki67 <10%, 49% for Ki67 10%-20%, and 76% for Ki67 > 20%. The central Ki67 results tended to be higher than the local testing results. Central mRNA classifiers were developed for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 using Fluidigm Microfluidics Dynamic Arrays and correlate highly with central IHC assessment of these markers. Conclusions: HR+ HER2- EBC is enriched for cancers with a low proliferative rate, a group of pts unlikely to benefit from the cell cycle-specific cytotoxic agent, capecitabine. Analyses of the impact of adjuvant X added to AC/T in EBC pts according to ER status, and according to Ki67 (analyzed as a binary and continuous variable) will be performed prior to SABCS, 2013. Number of Patients% Ki67 Pos CellsTotal *HR+TNHER2+/HR+HER2+/ HR-0-104163622222711-151391066151016-20126871615821-3018411539201031-1005751403423555Total144081042510790*Totals do not equal sum of subtype categories due to missing HER2 information Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-09-01.