Abstract P5-21-11: Benefit from palbociclib and fulvestrant based on previous fulvestrant and/or everolimus treatment. Based on a cohort of over 200 patients treated in a French compassionate program

Abstract

Abstract Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors have been approved in the recent years for the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. For patients with resistance to previous endocrine therapy, the approval is based on the results of the PALOMA-3 trial testing palbociclib in addition to fulvestrant observing a progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.2 months. Nevertheless, in this study no previous treatment with fulvestrant was allowed and no information had been reported of efficacy after everolimus administration. Patients and methods: We collected information from patients treated with palbociclib + fulvestrant in the context of a French compassionate access. We aimed at determining the benefit of this treatment in a real population to provide information about PFS in non-selected patients as well as efficacy of palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients previously treated with fulvestrant and/or everolimus. Median PFS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared with log-rank test. Results: 206 patients were identified from 5 institutions. Mean age at treatment was 61 years (range 28 – 85). 55% presented with visceral disease. Lines at where palbociclib + fulvestrant treatment was administered were as follows: 1% 1st line, 8.3% 2nd line, 19.4% 3rd line, 13.6% 4th line, 10.2% 5th lignes and the remaining 47.6% had received ≥6 lines (median: 5 lines, range 1 to 15). A total of 48% patients had previously been treated with fulvestrant. In a subsample of patient where the information was available (n=146), 67.8% patients had received everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy before palbociclib administration. A total of 77 patients were still on treatment. Median PFS on fulvestrant-palbociclib treatment at the date of data cut-off was of 5.46 months (95% CI; 4.6 to 6.6 months). In a univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in median PFS for patients treated or not with previous fulvestrant, suggesting a potential effect of palbociclib to recover sensitivity to fulvestrant (4.7 months for previous fulvestrant treatment [95% CI 4.07 - 6.3 months] vs 6.1 months for no previous fulvestrant [95% CI; 6.3 - 8.02 months], p=0.3559). Similarly, in the subsample of n=146 patients where information about previous everolimus treatment was available at data cut-off, benefit from palbociclib-fulvestrant was not affected by previous everolimus treatment (median PFS 4.8 months for previously treated [95% CI; 4.01 -7.8 months] vs 5.4 months for the untreated everolimus group [95% CI; 4.07 - 9.59 months], p=0.374). Conclusions: Fulvestrant-palbociclib in the real life is associated with a median PFS of 5.5 months, which is below the results provided in the PALOMA-3 trial, reflecting a much more advanced population. Importantly, neither previous everolimus treatment nor fulvestrant therapy affected benefit from fulvestrant-palbociclib in this population in univariate analyses suggesting a potential recovery of fulvestrant sensitivity with CDK4/6 inhibition. Results from multivariate analyses and more detailed information about patients' characteristics and benefit from previous therapies will be provided. Citation Format: Arnedos M, Rusquec P, Morelle M, Lebreton C, Jacquet E, Emile G, Aires J, Debled M, Frenel J-S, Augereau P, Cheaib B, Levy C, Bachelot T. Benefit from palbociclib and fulvestrant based on previous fulvestrant and/or everolimus treatment. Based on a cohort of over 200 patients treated in a French compassionate program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-11.