Abstract P490: Influence of Balloon Guide Catheter Use on Procedural & Clinical Outcomes in the Escape-NA1 Trial

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed whether balloon guide catheter (BGC) use during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) influences procedural and clinical outcomes in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial. Methods: ESCAPE-NA1 was an international multicenter trial that randomized large vessel occlusion stroke patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) to receive Nerinetide vs. placebo. Information on EVT techniques and devices was extracted from angiographic images and procedure report forms. Effect estimates of BGC use on angiographic and clinical outcomes were obtained with logistic regression with adjustment for age, ASPECTS, baseline NIHSS, occlusion site, alteplase and study drug treatment. Results: Detailed information on EVT devices and technique was available for 891/1105 (80.6%) patients. A BGC was used in 599/891 patients (67.2%). BGC use was most common with a retrievable stent use (with or without distal access catheter) as the first-line approach (in 252/266 cases [94.7%] vs. combined approach (both aspiration and SR): 288/414 [69.6%], vs. contact aspiration: 37/159 cases [23.3%]). Overall, eTICI 2b/3 rates with vs. without BGC did not differ significantly (525/598 [87.8%] vs. 260/292 [89.0%]), but eTICI 2c/3 rates were significantly higher when a BGC was used (304/598 [50.8%] vs. 126/292 [43.2%], adjusted OR 1.39 [95%CI 1.05 - 1.9]). Good outcomes (mRS 0-2) were not associated with BGC use (adjusted OR 1.07 [95%CI 0.78 - 1.48]). Conclusion: BGC use was associated with a greater proportion of near-complete reperfusion, while there was no significant association with clinical outcomes.