Abstract P4-12-23: Subcutaneous trastuzumab (Herceptin™) in patients with HER-2 positive early breast cancer: A UK time and motion study in comparison with intravenous formulation

Abstract

Abstract Aim: To quantify active healthcare professional (HCP) time and costs associated with subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) infusion administration of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer within the adjuvant PrefHer trial; secondly, to measure patient time in the care unit and patient chair time for both routes of administration. Methods: A UK multi-centre prospective, observational time and motion study was conducted alongside the PrefHer trial (ClinicalTrials.gov id: NCT01401166). Trained observers measured the duration of each SC and IV related task HCPs undertook and recorded patient time in the chemotherapy unit and treatment chair. The type and quantity of medical consumables used with each route of administration were also collected. 24 patient episodes were recorded (12 SC, 12 IV). Mean total administration time was calculated as the mean sum of task times, for both IV and SC formulations. The mean cost of each route of administration was calculated as the mean cost of HCP time plus the mean cost of consumables used. HCP time was costed using data from the Personal Social Services Research Unit. Consumables were costed using hospital pharmacy data and online sources. Results: Mean active HCP time for IV preparation and administration was 92.6 minutes compared with 24.6 minutes for SC administration. The mean cost for IV preparation and administration was £144.96 (£132.05 of HCP time and £12.92 of consumables) versus £33.15 (£31.99 of HCP time and £1.17 of consumables) for SC administration. Mean time spent by patients in the care unit and treatment chair was 94.5 minutes and 75 minutes respectively for IV, and 30.3 minutes and 19.8 minutes for SC. SC administration of trastuzumab could translate to a HCP time saving of 68 minutes (34.5 minutes of preparation time and 33.5 minutes of administration time) (versus IV) with a total cost saving of £111.81 per patient episode. This equates to a potential saving of £2012.58 over a full course of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment (18 cycles). Conclusion: Substituting IV infusion with SC administration of trastuzumab may lead to a substantial reduction in active HCP time, consumable use and overall cost. The reduced patient chair and unit time could provide increased capacity within existing resources. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-12-23.