Abstract P4-02-03: FDG PET/CT for early monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), initially used only for locally advanced breast cancer, is now commonly used in patients with operable but large breast cancer or unfavorable tumor/breast size index because increases the chances of performing breast conservative surgery (BCS) instead of mastectomy in this group of patients. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective unicenter trial. FDG PET/CT were performed in 40 patients at baseline and after the second cycle of NAC. The level and relative changes in standardized uptake value (SUV) of FDG uptake were assessed regarding their ability to predict histopathologic response. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no malignant cells (no invasive ductal carcinoma and no ductal carcinoma in situ) identifiable in sections from the site of the tumor in the breast and in the axillary lymph node. Results: This prospectively study analyzed forty patients undergoing NAC, all female, age ranged 27–64 years (mean 41.0 years and median 38 years), all tumors were invasive ductal carcinoma, histological tumor grade 1, 2 and 3 were present respectively at 5%, 38.5% and 100% of the sample and nuclear grade 2 and 3 were present respectively at 12.5% and 87.5%. Estrogen receptor was positive in 60% of patients and the progesterone receptor was positive in 47.5% of patients. Her 2 was overexpressed in 12 patients (30%). Phenotype in this sample had the following distribution: 12.5% luminal A (5 patients), 50% Luminal B (20 patients: 14 patients with Ki-67> 14% and 6 cases with HER 2 overexpression), 15 % HER 2 (6 patients) and cases triple negative 9 (22.5%). size of the primary tumor ranged from 4.10 cm to 12.0 cm (mean 7.10 cm). The size of the primary tumor ranged from had a mean of 6.7 cm and a median of 6.0 cm. This group showed great uniformity in relation to primary chemotherapy. NAC with cyclophosphamide and adriamycin were administered to 38 patients. In this study, pCR was obtained in 12 patients (30%). Baseline FDG SUV referring to pCR group was 11.26 and 7.26 in non-pCR group (p = 0.04). FDG SUV after second cycle was 2.73 in pCR group and 4.64 in non-pCR group (p = 0.048). When analyzing ΔSUV (difference between baseline SUV and SUV after second cycle), pCR group had a mean reduction of 81.58% and non-pCR group had a mean reduction of 81.58% (p = 0.001). Receiver operating curve analyses were performed to deter mine optimal differentiation cut-off values of ΔSUV for differentiation of pCR and non-pCR. After two courses of NAC the optimal cutoff value to early differentiation between pCR from non-pCR were 59,1% in decrease of SUV. The sensitivity and specificity were 64,3% and 100,0%, respectively. Conclusion: The optimum role of FDG PET in predicting the response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still not clearly defined and the SUV cut-off needs to be validated. FDG-PET allows for prediction of treatment response by the level of FDG uptake in terms of SUV at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy and FDG-PET may be helpful for individual treatment stratification in breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.