Abstract P4-06-09: Addition of a remote genetic counselor to the breast specialist's team improves clinical decision-making

Abstract

Abstract Background: There is a shortage of trained genetic counselors (GC) and often long wait times for appointments, resulting in other specialists frequently ordering genetic testing. However, non-genetic specialists, including breast surgeons, find it difficult to stay current in genetics due to rapid advances in gene discovery, expanded panel offerings, and frequent changes to professional guidelines. We tested a novel model for hereditary cancer risk assessment where breast surgeons had “on demand” access to a remote laboratory-based genetic counselor for peer to peer consultation. In this study we sought to determine the impact this model has on breast surgeons' routinely ordering genetic testing including test identification, ordering patterns, and medical management. Methods: An IRB approved multi-center prospective study involved 14 community-based breast cancer surgeons experienced with hereditary cancer risk assessment without a genetic counselor as part of their practice. Cases were all discussed with a remote Invitae GC to determine testing eligibility and selection. Physicians had the option to utilize remote GCs to discuss results or to refer to traditional genetic counseling services. Pre and post-test surveys were completed for each patient by the testing physician. To protect patient privacy, a unique case ID was used to link patient test data with identifying data. Results: A total of 192 patients were evaluated with median age of 52. Risk assessment via BRCAPRO and the Hughes Risk model were performed on 98% of patients by the physicians. 65% of patients met NCCN guidelines for testing. Pathogenic mutations were found in 14% of patients. Breast surgeons changed their test selection 21% of the time after discussion with a GC. They called to discuss results in 47% of cases and medical management changes were incorporated in 15% of these cases based on discussion with a remote GC. Conclusions: Remote GC provider support assisted physicians in facilitating customized test selection, aided in navigating challenging counseling cases, and impacted clinical management. This service may serve as a viable, effective model for 'on demand' genetic counseling support and may be a novel opportunity to expand genetic testing in a breast surgery setting. Citation Format: Rosen B, O'Leary E, Shan Y, Pat W, Peter B. Addition of a remote genetic counselor to the breast specialist's team improves clinical decision-making [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-09.