Abstract P3-08-09: Is it me or is it hot in here? Hot flushes (or flashes): An unmet need. UK NCRI breast clinical studies group working party on symptom management (vasomotor)

Abstract

Abstract Hot Flushes or Flashes are a serious problem. They impact significantly on daily life and sleep quality, affecting employment, relationships and quality of life. The only effective treatment for hot flushes is oestrogen which is contraindicated in 75% of breast cancer patients. An estimated 550,000 people now live in the UK with a diagnosis of breast cancer and up to 70% women experience disabling hot flushes which can continue for years after treatment. Studies have shown that up to 50% of patients stop taking their life-saving antioestrogen drugs before 5 years1 quite probably due to unacceptable side-effects On the initiative of the patient advocate members of the NCRI Breast Clinical Studies Group, a Working Party on Symptom Management has been established. Members of the group have a particular interest in hot flushes and include representatives from patients, oncology, psychology, gynaecology, acupuncture and the voluntary not-for-profit sector The Working Party audited current UK clinical practice for hot flushes in cancer with a short questionnaire circulated to the UK Breast Intergroup mailing list (about 800 breast cancer health professionals) and to the Breast Cancer Care Nursing Network (about 850 clinical nurse specialists/breast care nurses). The full results of the questionnaire will be presented Briefly, a small number of people were prescribed hormone replacement therapy or Progesterone (Megestrol acatate), more Clonidine and Gabapentin and many selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Although SSRIs have some effect in reducing the intensity of hot flushes, they have significant side effects including sexual dysfunction, in a group of women, many of whom are already suffering sexual problems due to anti-oestrogen drugs or premature menopause. In addition, available treatments (both pharmacological and non-pharmacological) varied across the UK. The majority (95%) of respondents to our questionnaire agreed or strongly agreed that treatment and management of hot flushes is an unmet need. The questionnaire also demonstrated inequality of access to treatment in the UK. An exploration of the US National Cancer Institute and UK clinical trials databases revealed very few studies working in this area. 21 studies in the UK, Europe and the USA since 2006. Most trials investigate non pharmacological approaches and combinations and new versions of existing approaches. There are no agreed guidelines for managing hot flushes after breast cancer, which may limit the access and availability of appropriate interventions. It is clear from our survey that clinicians are left making individual decisions based on personal experience and availability of local services, which has led to a patchy and inequitable position on the management of this troubling problem. There is a need for research to understand the physiology of flushing and to develop and test new interventions to address this intractable problem, which continues to be a cause of considerable distress to many women after breast cancer. 1. Makubate B et al Cohort study of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy, breast cancer recurrence and mortality.Br J Cancer. 2013;108:1515-24. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) Programme (project number 10/34/01). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-08-09.